Jay Naidoo

Food security: A matter of war and peace

This year marks the moment when the world’s population will pass the seven billion mark. It will be the first time in recorded history that the number of people will have doubled in the span of one generation. The implications of this monumental event on food security are enormous – and having enough to eat is an indubitably a hair-trigger for mass uprisings of the kind we’re seeing daily.

As we watch the 2011 revolutions continue to unfold in North Africa and the Middle East, it’s worth reflecting on the role of food security as a trigger of unrest. At the time of the first protests in Tunisia and Egypt, bread prices had risen 30% in the past year due to global shortages in the supply of wheat.

What’s striking is how this is reported as some sort of novelty or unexpected phenomenon. On closer examination of history, food security issues tend to accompany protests and revolutions. What should concern world leaders is not what has happened, but that we can expect much more of what’s already occurred. Early last month, the Food and Agricultural Organisation, the UN’s primary food and agriculture monitoring body, issued a release announcing global record highs for food prices and the seventh consecutive month of price increases.

Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it, the adage cautions. Why are we not learning? The cautionary tales are there. From France to India, hunger and food production have long played a major role in revolutions and social upheaval. Food security, then and today, remains a trigger of conflict.

While difficult to imagine, given their culinary eminence today, many Frenchmen subsisted only on bread and little else in the 18th century. The roots of the French Revolution were created during the harsh winter of 1788-89, when wheat shortages caused the price of bread to rise nearly 90% in one year, and the people turned on the government, demanding relief. During the Revolution itself, bread riots again erupted, helping to ignite the infamous Reign of Terror in 1793.

Nearly 150 years later in India, Gandhi set out on his famous “Salt Satyagraha,” walking 240 miles to the coast to produce salt without paying tax, enduring beatings after violating the British Raj salt laws and growing a movement. This display of civil disobedience encouraged millions of Indians to follow suit, setting the stage for the long-term recognition of claims by Gandhi and India’s Congress Party.

In its most recent edition, The Economist asked “the nine billion person question” — that is to say, how will the world feed the more than 2 billion new mouths that will likely be added over the next 40 years. There were some answers — e.g. higher yielding and “biofortified” crops, better use of technology and irrigation, reducing waste – but certainly not enough to make up the difference when you consider a billion individuals around the world are already suffering from chronic hunger today. Add in the fact that many in the emerging middle class in China and India have a growing appetite for meat and the dramatic effects of climate change, and you have a formula for serious unrest.

Food, one of the staples of human survival, has long been present, if on the perimeter, of revolutions and protests across the world. Price increases have forced millions of people into poverty and who must spend more than 50% of their income on putting food on the table. As the numbers of hungry mouths grow, and we have precious few answers, we should all expect food to migrate from the periphery of protests and conflict to the centre.

The Daily Maverick: Read more

Related article: Many facets to the ‘business’ of food security

Albeit usually driven by profits in a highly competitive environment (what business is not), food security in South Africa is a multi-facetted industry extending well beyond the narrow and often-capricious parochial interests of government, writes RALPH HAMANN.