More results...

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

US: Settlement reached in ‘pink slime’ lawsuit

The ‘pink slime’ saga that bedevilled the US meat/burger industry since 2012 has reached a legal conclusion – with litigant, South Dakota meat producer, Beef Products, accepting a settlement from TV network, ABC, in the middle of a defamation trial.

Ending an anticipated eight-week-long trial early, Beef Products (BPI) announced June 28 that it has received an undisclosed settlement amount from American Broadcasting Companies (ABC) regarding its libel case that alleged that ABC damaged BPI by dubbing its signature product – lean, finely textured beef (LFTB) – as “pink slime” in a network news series.

The South Dakota meat producer filed a more than $1-billion lawsuit – which, under South Dakota law, could have ballooned to as much as $5.7-billion – against the network after the series, which ran in March 2012, resulted in BPI suspending operations at three manufacturing facilities in Amarillo, Texas; Garden City, Kan, and Waterloo, Iowa, and laying off more than 650 employees.

By the end of the month-long ABC campaign, BPI claimed that its sales had been reduced by more than two-thirds. By May of the same year, BPI announced that the plant closures would be permanent and laid off an additional 86 employees from the corporate offices and remaining operation.

In September 2012, BPI filed a civil suit against ABC in circuit court in Union County, SD, claiming that ABC knowingly disparaged BPI and LFTB in a series of reports with factually inaccurate statements that damaged BPI’s reputation and destroyed its relationships with customers. After several attempts by ABC to have the case dismissed or moved, the trial began earlier in June.

A statement issued by BPI and the Roth family regarding the settlement of their libel and defamation case against ABC and reporter Jim Avila noted, “We are extraordinarily pleased to have reached a settlement of our lawsuit against ABC and Jim Avila. While this has not been an easy road to travel, it was necessary to begin rectifying the harm we suffered as a result of what we believed to be biased and baseless reporting in 2012.

“Through this process, we have again established what we all know to be true about lean finely textured beef: It is beef and is safe, wholesome and nutritious.

“This agreement provides us with a strong foundation on which to grow the business while allowing us to remain focused on achieving the vision of the Roth and BPI family,” the statement concluded.

ABC said in a statement it had reached an “amicable resolution” of the dispute.

“Throughout this case, we have maintained that our reports accurately presented the facts and views of knowledgeable people about this product,” ABC’s statement said.

“Although we have concluded that continued litigation of this case is not in the company’s interests, we remain committed to the vigorous pursuit of truth and the consumer’s right to know about the products they purchase.”


Related reading:

US: ‘Pink slime’ making a comeback

A much, and incorrectly, maligned beef product that was a common ingredient in hamburger patties and other prepared dishes is making a comeback in the US.

‘Pink Slime’ manufacturer sues ABC News for $1,2 billion

September 20, 2012

Big Beef has decided someone’s head is going to roll for that whole ‘Pink Slime’ saga earlier this year, and that someone is ABC News.

The fallout from the ‘pink slime’ saga

Beef Products Inc, the maker of the beef product dubbed “pink slime” by critics announced this week that it was laying off 86 employees from its corporate office in South Dakota, citing what it called the misinformation campaign about a product that is both safe and widely used.

US: The ‘pink slime’ furore

Battalions of American food police have been up in arms of late over ‘pink slime’, aka lean finely textured beef (LFTB), which given its horrible moniker by two former USDA scientists, turned whistle-blowers, who claim that it was approved for consumption for political reasons despite safety concerns.

No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.